You need to equip and support 35 new hires across 11 countries, but Presidio only handles hardware procurement and delivery. The rest of the hardware lifecycle sits outside what its published services offer.
That's why Presidio alternatives are worth considering when repairs, retrievals, redeployment, and disposal become part of your daily workload.
Presidio is still a strong partner for cloud, cybersecurity, AI deployment, product design, and broader IT support. But relying on it for global IT asset management will leave IT handling everything after delivery.
And that extra burden eventually shows up as waste, security risks, and financial blind spots.
New purchases going off the radar after delivery. Former employees holding on to laptops and company data longer than they should. And Finance is unable to forecast future spend because the current data is unreliable.
According to Workwize research, IT loses 20 to 40% of its work hours to hardware-related operations. HP also reported that lost and stolen devices cost the global economy up to $8.6B annually.
The right alternatives to Presidio for device lifecycle management can help you avoid these problems. I'll outline providers like Workwize that can handle everything from end-to-end procurement through disposal.
Presidio is a U.S.-based IT solutions provider focused on cloud, cybersecurity, networking, and digital transformation.
The platform also handles product lifecycle management, which includes designing and managing tech products for large enterprises. Other services and solutions include automations, AI implementations, managed cloud solutions, cost optimization, and global procurement and logistics.
However, the global procurement and logistics service does not cover deployment for non-Apple devices or handle post-delivery IT asset management.
Presidio competitors like Workwize are more purpose-built for procuring, deploying, managing, and redeploying employee hardware, whether workers are based in Torino or Bangkok.
Here's a quick view of the best Presidio competitors, highlighting their ideal use cases, global reach, lifecycle depth, and key gaps.
|
Vendor |
Best for |
Global reach |
Lifecycle depth |
Key gap vs Workwize |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Workwize |
Distributed and remote-first global IT teams |
100+ countries, with multi-regional local warehouses |
Full. Procure, deploy, track, retrieve, dispose. |
– |
|
Presidio |
Enterprise cloud, AI, cybersecurity, and managed network |
160 countries for procurement and logistics |
Low. Procurement and Apple device deployment only. |
No automated device lifecycle for distributed employees |
|
CDW |
Enterprise procurement |
Low. Uses third-party vendors for deployment and management. Lacks ITAD. |
Depends on partners to manage hardware and treats ITAD as a separate service |
|
|
WWT |
Large U.S. enterprise and federal IT infrastructure |
Low. Lifecycle service only provides data and insights |
No physical lifecycle management |
|
|
SHI |
Global procurement and enterprise software licensing |
High. |
No lifecycle automation |
|
|
Insight |
Cybersecurity, Data center, Hybrid cloud, and digital services |
25 countries and claims global reach |
Low-medium |
No purpose-built lifecycle platform |
|
Trace3 |
Mid-market AI, data, cloud, and cybersecurity |
U.S.-focused |
Low. Cloud, data, and security services. The LAMP platform manages devices using data. |
No distributed device lifecycle capability |
|
Zones |
Distributed enterprise IT procurement |
180+ countries (supply chain) |
Full. Procurement through ITAD. |
Fewer countries than Workwize |
|
AHEAD |
Mid-market cloud and digital transformation, data center, and cybersecurity |
Low. Focuses on enterprise tech stacks |
No global device lifecycle capability |
|
|
Kyndryl |
Large enterprise managed infrastructure services |
Full, but through its Device-as-a-Service model. |
Limited to DaaS |